Monday, July 13, 2009

'09 Dodge Challenger SRT8 = Retro Cool Ass Kicker


Fashion is a weird thing. The last time big American muscle cars were the rage was in the ‘70s, before I started grade school. Then in the Eighties I thought these muscle cars were dinosaurs and were ugly as hell. But by now we all recognize the horror of the boxy cars designed and produced in the ‘80s, and think these ‘70s muscle cars look awesome. I’m sure the next decade will find some redeeming qualities in the designs from the ‘80s and '90s. And speaking of retro styling, the Challenger stayed the truest to the original form from three decades ago. The new Mustang and Camaro are more of a reinterpretation of their original forms, while the Challenger looks like it simply went through a time machine into the future and just came out more streamlined and lost a few pounds along the way.

A few words on how it drove

Challenger w Hooters Girls

Now I was thoroughly impressed with the awesome, simply awesome performance of the tester. The SRT8 had a 6.1 liter Hemi V8 matched to a 6-speed manual, with 425 HP and 420 lb.-ft. of torque. Yep, simply awesome performance. There's a performance tracker that lets you measure 0-60, 1/8-mile, 1/4-mile times as well as braking distance and G forces. The 6-speed manual with the pistol grip shifted smoothly and felt like a short-throw shifter. At times I had trouble getting into 6th and ended up downshifting to 4th on the highway, which was quite a surprise. The Challenger SRT8 handled surprisingly well too, considering its size and weight. Best of all, the V8 just sounded like a beast. It sounded awesome and drew a lot of attention. Unfortunately most of the attention came from guys, which brings us to the styling and design of the car.

Now, the styling.

The Exterior

Challenger w Angelica

First of all I just want to say that I'm a big fan of the Challenger's design. The profile looks great, with its long, flat hood and a long, flat roof, and the characteristic hump over the back wheel. The hump(see illustration below as shown by our lovely assistants Angelica and Melissa from Hooters Campbell) works much better on the Challenger with its shorter wheelbase than it does on the Charger. It's just better on a coupe.

The thick C pillar is bad for visibility but a key reminder of the original design. I could not see out the side when I was driving, but the truth is after a while I didn’t care. I figured people would just get the hell out of the way when they see this monster coming into their lane. The air scoops on the hood are really well-integrated and are actually functional. The 20" forged aluminum wheels fit the Challenger extremely well and the red Brembo brakes make the car stand out even more. The SRT8 also features a chrome fuel cap instead of the standard body-colored fuel door, a great highlight. The race car sideview mirrors are well suited and further separate the Challenger from the Charger, in addition to the shorter wheelbase. Did I mention that classic Challenger hump in the beltline as indicated in these photos already?

The car just looks like it's ready to pounce when it's standing still, and just looks powerful.

There’s really not that much wrong with the design of the Challenger, the only improvement I can think of is more chrome accents on the front bumper and rear bumper like the thin chrome bumpers of the original Challenger from 1970-1974. The other thing worthy of mention is the carbon fiber-like trim stickers on the hood...they work great on the light silver tester, but are somewhat tacky because it's about as close to real carbon fiber as the wood trim on a 2002 Hyundai Sonata is to real walnut.

The Interior

The interior is the worse part on this Challenger. Not that the trim is bad or anything. The material is surprisingly great for an American car. The plastics feel pretty sturdy and heavy and not cheap looking or feeling. The center-mounted touch screen Sirius nav/DVD unit looks clean and modern.

Hooters girl Angelica

It's just that the interior looks like every other Chrysler, and is not differentiated at all from that of a Charger or a Chrysler 300. Boring is the word that comes to mind. It does not live up to the promise of the exterior. Wait, actually, the interior doesn't look that bad in this picture...maybe it's the lighting, or the angle of the shot, hmmm, that's strange.

Conclusion

It's rare that I don't have something bad to say about the styling of a car, with the exception of my G35, but I really like the design of the Dodge Challenger SRT8. The fact that it stays true to the original '70s car but manages to tighten up the package despite the challenge of starting with the platform and body of a 4-door sedan (Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger) makes this an amazing design job. The car retains the wild beasty powerful look and has a stage presence that's impossible to ignore. When you roll up and rev the engine, everyone will know you've arrived doing 15 MPG. Even my wife, who doesn't normally give a rat's ass about cars, said, "I can see how some people would like this car." That's saying a lot, trust me.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Coming soon...the 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8!

I had a '09 Dodge Challenger to test drive this past weekend and took a bunch of photos...stay tuned for the review and pics...


Saturday, December 6, 2008

2010 Ford Mustang GT could be so much more


When I first saw the new 2010 Ford Mustangs from far across the convention floor at the 2008 LA Auto Show, I swear I could not tell that they were new.   I guess Ford decided to play it safe again, God forbid they take any risks.

The Good - Well to start off, I actually really like the current generation Mustang design. I still think that Ford pulled off this retro muscle car design better than GM did with the new Chevy Camaro.  So the fact that the 2010 Mustang is not that different than the current design, it is a good thing.  I like the evolutionary changes.  The front end is more aggressive and the sheet metal looks more tightly wrapped around the front end.  The hump in the hood is pretty cool.  Frontend changes: B+.

The Bad - The flare over the rear wheel.  Hmmm, where have I seen that recently?  Let’s see, oh yeah, EVERYWHERE! They should’ve done something about the rear side window, it’s more boring than the ugly one on the new Nissan 370z.

The Ugly - Ford decided the chisel off the corners of the new Mustang, including the tail lights. The result is a disaster.  I liked the current car’s tail end with its right-angled corners. The chiseled-off corners make the new Mustang look less aggressive for some reason, which is strange because the new front end is more aggressive.

Overall I give this Mustang refresh a B.  Ford could have and should have gone further to meet the upcoming challenge from the new Camaro and the Challenger.  But I guess given the current state of the car industry, maybe Ford doesn’t have to worry too much about the Camaro and certainly not the Challenger.  Maybe they should put the new hybrid engine from the Fusion into the Mustang.